An Empirical Study of Multimedia Argumentation
نویسنده
چکیده
We have analyzed a corpus of human-authored arguments expressed in text and information graphics, non-pictorial graphics such as bar graphs. The goal of our research is to enable intelligent argument generation systems to make effective use of these media. This paper presents and compares two classification schemes used to analyze the corpus, illustrated by examples from the corpus, and discusses implications for generation systems.
منابع مشابه
Supplier Development Activities and Buying Firm’s Performance: An Empirical Investigation of Iranian SMEs
This study attempts to investigate the major antecedent factors that influence manufacturing SMEs intentions toward the implementation of supplier development activities in Iranian SMEs. In order to achieve this objective, the research constructs were developed. The conceptual framework underlying this study was based on the theories of supplier development activities and social capital. These...
متن کاملArgumentation Theory in the Field: An Empirical Study of Fundamental Notions
Argumentation Theory provides a very powerful set of principles, ideas and models. Yet, in this paper we will show that its fundamental principles unsatisfactorily explain real-world human argumentation, and should be adapted. We will present an extensive empirical study on the incompatibility of abstract argumentation and human argumentative behavior, followed by practical expansion of existin...
متن کاملEmpirical Argumentation: Integrating Induction and Argumentation in MAS
This paper presents an approach that integrates notions and techniques from two distinct fields of study —namely inductive learning and argumentation in multiagent systems (MAS). We will first discuss inductive learning and the role argumentation plays in multiagent inductive learning. Then we focus on how inductive learning can be used to realize argumentation in MAS based on empirical grounds...
متن کاملCollaborative Argumentation in Learning Resource Evaluation and Design
LORI (learning object review instrument) is an evaluation framework designed to support collaborative critique of multimedia learning resources. In this chapter, the interactions among reviewers using LORI are framed as a form of collaborative argumentation. Research on collaborative evaluation of learning resources has found that reviewers’ quality ratings tend to converge as a result of their...
متن کاملIdentifying Argumentation Schemes in Genetics Research Articles
This paper presents preliminary work on identification of argumentation schemes, i.e., identifying premises, conclusion and name of argumentation scheme, in arguments for scientific claims in genetics research articles. The goal is to develop annotation guidelines for creating corpora for argumentation mining research. This paper gives the specification of ten semantically distinct argumentatio...
متن کامل